Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has tested positive for COVID-19 a second time and gone into isolation.

Mr Albanese has postponed a meeting of state and territory leaders, which was set to address solutions to high energy prices.

"This afternoon I had a routine PCR test which has returned a positive result for COVID-19," he said on Monday.

"I encourage anyone who is unwell to test and to take any extra precautions to keep their families and neighbours well."

The prime minister is up to date with his booster shots.

The upcoming national cabinet meeting was set to focus on energy prices, with the federal government determined to act on soaring power bills before Christmas.

Mr Albanese wants to strike a balance between coal and gas companies making a profit and households and small businesses affording to keep the lights on.

"I don't think there is a premier or chief minister who will sit back and say 'yep this is all ok' as prices continue to rise," he said before the meeting was postponed.

The prime minister's planned trip to Papua New Guinea next week is also up in the air.

Mr Albanese first contracted COVID during the federal election campaign, forcing him into isolation for a week.

He still managed to campaign and do interviews from home but his frontbench team took charge of the bustling media schedule.

© AAP 2022

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has tested positive for COVID-19 for a second time and gone into isolation.

"This afternoon I had a routine PCR test which has returned a positive result for COVID-19," Mr Albanese said on Monday.

"I encourage anyone who is unwell to test and to take any extra precautions to keep their families and neighbours well."

The prime minister is at Kirribilli House and is up to date with his booster shots.

Mr Albanese is expected to take part in a national cabinet meeting on Wednesday and is planning a trip to Papua New Guinea next week.

© AAP 2022

Indonesia is expected to ratify sweeping changes to its criminal code on Tuesday, senior officials confirmed, in a legal overhaul that critics say could wind back hard-won democratic freedoms and police morality in the Southeast Asian nation.

Among the most controversial revisions to the code are articles that would penalise sex outside of marriage with up to one year in jail, outlaw cohabitation between unmarried couples, insulting the president, and expressing views counter to the national ideology, known as the Pancasila.

Deputy speaker of the House of Representatives, Sufmi Dasco Ahmad, and Bambang Wuryanto, head of the parliamentary commission overseeing the revision, told Reuters on Monday that parliament would hold a plenary session on Tuesday to ratify the new code.

The government and House of Representatives have agreed on the draft code, clearing a hurdle to its passage.

Decades in the making, the revision of the country's colonial-era penal code has sparked mass protests in recent years, although the response has been considerably more muted this year.

Parliament had planned to ratify a draft new code in September 2019, but nationwide demonstrations over perceived threats to civil liberties halted its passage.

Legislators in the world's third-largest democracy have since watered down some of the articles deemed most contentious.

Revised articles on sex outside marriage and cohabitation, for example, now state such complaints can only be reported by close relatives such as a spouse, parent or child, while insulting the president can only be reported by the president.

But legal experts and civil society groups say the changes don't go far enough.

"This criminal code is a huge setback for Indonesia," said Bivitri Susanti, a law expert from the University of Indonesia.

"The state cannot manage morality," she said. "The government's duty is not as an umpire between conservative and liberal Indonesia."

Articles on customary law, blasphemy, protesting without notification and expressing views divergent from the Pancasila were all legally problematic because they could be widely interpreted, she said.

Once ratified, the new code will come into effect after three years as the government and related institutions draft related implementing regulations.

© RAW 2022

Senior Human Services figures "effectively co-wrote" an independent Commonwealth Ombudsman report into their own department's dodgy robodebt scheme.

That was revealed when the royal commission into the scheme that falsely accused welfare recipients of owing money continued on Monday, with former senior Department of Human Services - now Services Australia - official Jason McNamara giving evidence.

Mr McNamara readily admitted he was trying to influence the Ombudsman when they wrote to the department in 2017 seeking feedback for a report it was writing into their shift to an automated debt recovery system.

One department official told colleagues via email it was "a great opportunity to effectively co-write the report".

That email suggested the Ombudsman could copy and paste their content into the final report.

The report did identify a number of flaws in the scheme but stopped short of declaring its 'income averaging' debt calculation process unlawful.

Mr McNamara was then shown a number of edits made to the language in the draft report that looked to downplay the negative impact of the scheme.

Asked by counsel assisting the commission Angus Scott if one particular edit was to produce a sentence less scathing of the program, Mr McNamara responded: "Yes, definitely".

They also had input to the recommendations the Ombudsman report made.

Mr McNamara did not accept department influence challenged the Ombudsman's neutrality, saying the practice was "quite normal" and they were free to reject the suggestions if they wanted.

The commission was shown Mr McNamara applied for the position of Treasury's deputy secretary and boasted he had "shaped" the Ombudsman's report.

It also saw evidence former Human Services Minister Alan Tudge pointed to the Ombudsman report in face of criticism of the scheme through a Senate report.

Robodebt, initiated under the former Liberal-National government, issued automated debt notices via a process called income averaging, which compared people's reported income with tax office figures.

Averaging recipients' income meant welfare payments they were entitled to in certain weeks were later ruled as debt.

Mr McNamara would not accept commissioner Catherine Holmes' assertion the unlawful income averaging was "a guess", insisting it should be described as "an estimate".

The commission is investigating how the scheme, which operated between 2015 and 2020, went ahead despite government departments knowing the debt calculation method was unlawful.

Earlier, senior counsel assisting the commission Justin Greggery KC said relevant former Morrison government ministers including Mr Tudge, Stuart Robert, Christian Porter, Dan Tehan and Paul Fletcher are likely to be called to give evidence.

The social services and human services ministers at the time the scheme was established - Scott Morrison and Marise Payne respectively - are already scheduled to front hearings next week.

Mr Gregg said the other ministers would be called in a subsequent hearing block. The next block of public hearings are set for January 23 to February 3.

Ms Payne will give evidence next Tuesday before Mr Morrison takes the stand on Wednesday.

© AAP 2022