Received
- Details
- Written by Grant Broadcasters
- Category: Received
- Hits: 80
A former Morrison government minister has issued a warning to his ex-colleagues ahead of a Liberal Party meeting to discuss the Indigenous voice proposal.
Ken Wyatt, the first Indigenous Australian elected to the House of Representatives, said a decision not to support the voice could come back to bite the Liberal Party.
"Parties that are out of touch will pay the consequence in the future," he told ABC Radio National on Wednesday.
Mr Wyatt said debate in the lead-up to the marriage equality plebiscite in 2017 showed social media should not be underestimated by politicians.
"Parties can no longer ignore the will of people because social media has a profound impact in informing people on (the) fairness they want within Australian society," he said.
Liberal MPs are preparing to land a formal position on the voice after months spent trading barbs with the prime minister over the proposal.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton summoned party members to a meeting in Canberra on Wednesday.
His deputy Sussan Ley said a bipartisan voice process had gone "off the rails" because the prime minister had been unwilling to answer the opposition's questions.
"There isn't a moral high ground, there is no one (person) who is better able to articulate that by way of simply pushing something through and demanding that Australians vote for it," she told Sky News ahead of the meeting.
"Unfortunately, in my view, the process has run well and truly off the rails."
But Mr Wyatt, a member of the government's referendum working group providing advice on the voice, said Ms Ley was incorrect.
"This is not all new work, it's been a culmination from (former) prime minister John Howard, Julia Gillard and subsequent prime ministers," he said.
"We've had this continuity and there have been numerous reports.
"People who argue contrary to that shows they did not give scant attention to even the executive summary of those reports."
Some elected Liberals have called for a conscience vote on the matter, with NSW senator Andrew Bragg and Victoria's Jason Wood saying that was in line with party tradition.
Referendum working group member Thomas Mayo urged the Liberals to support a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice, something which was long overdue.
"There's nothing to lose for Australia and everything to gain," he told Sky News.
"I say to the Liberal Party: reach into your hearts, think about what this (referendum) is for Australia, which is truly unifying."
Meanwhile, a Newspoll conducted for The Australian and reported on Tuesday night showed 54 per cent of all voters support constitutional recognition and and the voice to parliament, with 38 per cent opposed.
The poll signals the likelihood that a referendum would meet the critical double majority test to succeed if one were held today, and that the referendum would also meet the requirement of obtaining a majority of voters in a majority of states, with Queensland the only state to fall short.
Liberal senator Hollie Hughes said the only poll which counted was the one on the day of the referendum, due to be held between October and December.
But Mr Mayo said the early polling indicated the sentiment of the Australian people was with the referendum working group and the 'yes' campaign.
"(Australians) have walked with us for a long time now ... to see these results tells us that we can succeed when the referendum is held," he said.
© AAP 2023
- Details
- Written by Grant Broadcasters
- Category: Received
- Hits: 80
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says calls from the Liberal Party to delay a referendum on an Indigenous voice are absurd.
Mr Albanese is seeking bipartisan support for the proposal, with the Liberals yet to reveal their final position.
"This is a nation-building effort and I call upon everyone to support it," he told reporters in Canberra.
"This is not controversial and should not be an issue of partisan politics. It's a modest proposal."
In an address to the National Press Club this week, shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser questioned the timing of the proposal and urged the Albanese government to delay the referendum.
But Mr Albanese said the opposition was trying to undermine support for a 'yes' vote.
"The idea that the impediment (for their support) is timing is just absurd," he said.
"The idea that you can simply ignore or dismiss the views of the referendum working group in my view contradicts the very concept of a voice which is about listening."
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton summoned Liberal MPs and senators to a party room meeting in Canberra on Wednesday to discuss the Indigenous voice proposal.
Meanwhile, former Morrison government minister Ken Wyatt issued a warning to his ex-colleagues ahead of the meeting.
Mr Wyatt, the first Indigenous Australian elected to the House of Representatives, said a decision not to support the voice could come back to bite the Liberal Party.
"Parties that are out of touch will pay the consequence in the future," he told ABC Radio National on Wednesday.
Deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley said a bipartisan voice process had gone "off the rails" because the prime minister had been unwilling to answer the opposition's questions.
But Mr Wyatt, a member of the government's referendum working group providing advice on the voice, said Ms Ley was incorrect.
"This is not all new work, it's been a culmination from (former) prime minister John Howard, Julia Gillard and subsequent prime ministers," he said.
"We've had this continuity and there have been numerous reports.
"People who argue contrary to that shows they did not give scant attention to even the executive summary of those reports."
Some elected Liberals have called for a conscience vote on the matter, with NSW senator Andrew Bragg and Victoria's Jason Wood saying that was in line with party tradition.
Referendum working group member Thomas Mayo urged the Liberals to support a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice, something which was long overdue.
"There's nothing to lose for Australia and everything to gain," he told Sky News.
"I say to the Liberal Party: reach into your hearts, think about what this (referendum) is for Australia, which is truly unifying."
Meanwhile, a Newspoll conducted for The Australian and reported on Tuesday night showed 54 per cent of all voters support constitutional recognition and and the voice to parliament, with 38 per cent opposed.
The poll signalled the likelihood that a referendum would meet the critical double majority test to succeed if one were held today.
Liberal senator Hollie Hughes said the only poll which counted was the one on the day of the referendum, due to be held between October and December.
But Mr Mayo said the early polling indicated the sentiment of the Australian people was with the referendum working group and the 'yes' campaign.
"(Australians) have walked with us for a long time now ... to see these results tells us that we can succeed when the referendum is held," he said.
© AAP 2023
- Details
- Written by Grant Broadcasters
- Category: Received
- Hits: 74
Former US president Donald Trump has railed against his indictment following his court appearance in New York, saying "the only crime that I have committed is to fearlessly defend our nation from those who seek to destroy it".
"I never thought anything like this could happen in America," he told supporters at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Tuesday evening after flying back from his historic court appearance in New York City.
The Republican accused Democrats of spying on his campaign and listed what he claimed were "fraudulent investigations" of his conduct while in office, such as the probe into Russian interference in the 2020 election.
He called the 34 felony counts of falsifying business records brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, "massive election interference at a scale never seen before in our country".
Trump returned to Florida after pleading not guilty in a Manhattan court on Tuesday afternoon, where prosecutors accused him of orchestrating payments to two women before the 2016 US election to suppress publication of their sexual encounters with him.
They allege Trump - the first sitting or former US president to face criminal charges - falsified business records to conceal a violation of election laws during his successful 2016 campaign.
The two women were adult film actor Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal.
Prosecutor Chris Conroy said: "The defendant Donald J Trump falsified New York business records in order to conceal an illegal conspiracy to undermine the integrity of the 2016 presidential election and other violations of election laws."
While falsifying business records in New York is punishable by no more than one year in prison, it is punishable by up to four years when done to advance or conceal another crime, such as election law violations.
Prosecutors said Trump, 76, made a series of threatening social media posts, including one threatening "death and destruction" if he was charged. The judge asked the parties to "please refrain from making statements that are likely to incite violence or civil unrest".
Trump, the frontrunner in the race for the Republican nomination in 2024, said nothing as he entered the courtroom or when he left roughly an hour later.
Justice Juan Merchan set the next hearing for December 4. Legal experts say a trial might not begin for a year, and indictment or even a conviction will not legally stop Trump running for president.
"We're going to fight it hard," Todd Blanche, a lawyer for Trump, told reporters after the arraignment, adding that Trump was frustrated, upset and angry about the charges.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat who has been accused by Trump and other Republicans of targeting him for political reasons, defended the charges.
"We today uphold our solemn responsibility to ensure that everyone stands equal before the law. No amount of money and no amount of power changes that enduring American principle," Bragg told a news conference.
The Manhattan grand jury convened by Bragg heard evidence about a $US130,000 ($A193,000) payment made to Daniels in the waning days of the 2016 presidential campaign. Daniels has said she was paid to keep silent about a sexual encounter she had with Trump at a Lake Tahoe hotel in 2006.
The former publisher of the National Enquirer, David Pecker, offered to look out for negative stories during Trump's presidential campaign, prosecutors said. American Media Inc, its parent company, paid McDougal $US150,000 to buy the rights to her story but then kept it secret.
It also paid a former Trump Tower doorman $US30,000 to buy the rights to an untrue story about a child Trump had allegedly fathered out of wedlock.
Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen says he co-ordinated with Trump on payments to Daniels and McDougal. Trump has denied having had sexual relationships with either woman, but has acknowledged reimbursing Cohen for his payment to Daniels.
Trump's reimbursement cheques to a lawyer for the suppression payments falsely stated the money was for a "retainer agreement", prosecutors said. The indictment accused Trump of falsifying his real estate company's books with intent to defraud.
Trump supporters and detractors before the arraignment were separated by barricades set up by police, though there were some confrontations.
© RAW 2023
- Details
- Written by Grant Broadcasters
- Category: Received
- Hits: 76
Former president Donald Trump has been charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in a historic case over allegations he orchestrated hush-money payments to two women before the 2016 US election to suppress publication of their sexual encounters with him.
Prosecutors in Manhattan accused Trump, the first sitting or former US president to face criminal charges, of trying to conceal a violation of election laws during his successful 2016 campaign.
"Not guilty," Trump, 76, said when asked by the judge in court how he pleaded on Tuesday. Wearing a dark blue suit and red tie, Trump sat, subdued, with his hands folded at the defence table flanked by his lawyers.
Prosecutor Chris Conroy said: "The defendant Donald J Trump falsified New York business records in order to conceal an illegal conspiracy to undermine the integrity of the 2016 presidential election and other violations of election laws."
While falsifying business records in New York on its own is punishable by no more than one year in prison, it is elevated to up to four years when done to advance or conceal another crime, such as election law violations.
The two women in the case are adult film actor Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal.
The judge asked the parties to not to make statements "likely to incite violence or civil unrest" following social media posts by Trump, including one threatening "death and destruction" if he was charged.
Trump supporters and detractors were separated by barricades outside court, though there were some confrontations.
Trump flew home to Florida where he addressed family, friends and supporters at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Tuesday night, delivering a litany of grievances against investigators and prosecutors and rival politicians.
He described the prosecution by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg as election interference.
"I never thought anything like this could happen in America," Trump said. "The only crime that I've committed has been to fearlessly defend our nation against those who seek to destroy it."
Trump faces a separate criminal probe by a Georgia prosecutor into whether he unlawfully tried to overturn his 2020 election defeat in the state. He also faces two US Justice Department investigations into attempts to overturn the 2020 election results and his handling of classified documents after leaving office.
"They can't beat us at the ballot box so they try to beat us through the law," Trump said.
Justice Juan Merchan set the next hearing for December 4. Legal experts say a trial might not even begin for a year, and indictment or even a conviction will not legally prevent Trump running for president.
"We're going to fight it hard," Todd Blanche, a lawyer for Trump, told reporters after the arraignment.
Bragg, a Democrat accused by Trump and other Republicans of targeting him for political reasons, defended the charges, telling a news conference: "We today uphold our solemn responsibility to ensure that everyone stands equal before the law."
The grand jury convened by Bragg heard evidence about a $US130,000 ($A193,000) payment made to Daniels in the waning days of the 2016 presidential campaign. Daniels has said she was paid to keep silent about a sexual encounter she had with Trump at a Lake Tahoe hotel in 2006.
The former publisher of the National Enquirer, David Pecker, offered to look out for negative stories during Trump's campaign, prosecutors said. American Media Inc, its parent company, paid McDougal $US150,000 to buy the rights to her story but then kept it secret.
It also paid a former Trump Tower doorman $US30,000 to buy the rights to an untrue story about a child Trump had allegedly fathered out of wedlock.
Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen says he co-ordinated with Trump on payments to Daniels and McDougal. Trump has denied having had sexual relationships with either woman but has acknowledged reimbursing Cohen for his payment to Daniels.
Trump's reimbursement cheques to a lawyer for the suppression payments falsely stated the money was for a "retainer agreement", prosecutors said. The indictment accused Trump of falsifying his real estate company's books with intent to defraud.
Bragg's office did not charge Trump with violating election laws.
© RAW 2023
Page 295 of 1496